ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Evaluation of an HPV16-L1 antibody rapid test for oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis: diagnostic accuracy and challenges in real-world settings.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [The role of serological (rapid) tests for the early detection of HPV-related cancers].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Pooled it
- Reconsidering serological strategies for HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer screening.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic assays have been introduced to diagnose human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC), including those identifying HPV16-L1 antibodies. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an HPV16-L1 antibody rapid test for HPV-OPC, and its performance in individuals likely to have HPV16-L1 antibodies from causes other than HPV-OPC.
methodsSerum samples (n = 235) from three study populations were tested using a CE-certified serological HPV16-L1 antibody rapid test (Prevo-Check®) at the German National Reference Center for Papillomaviruses. Laboratory personnel were blinded to participant characteristics and followed the manufacturer's instructions. The three study populations consisted of: (1) patients with HPV16-positive or -negative OPC (n = 83), (2) bivalent (HPV16/18) vaccine recipients (n = 50), with paired baseline and one-month post-third-dose serum samples, and (3) naturally HPV16 infected young adults (n = 26), with paired serum samples before and after HPV16 seroconversion.
findingsIn the study population with patients with OPC, the sensitivity of the HPV16-L1 antibody rapid test to detect HPV-OPC was 25.0% (95% CI: 13.6, 39.6), and its specificity was 97.1% (95% CI: 85.1, 99.9). The positive predictive value was 92.3% (95% CI: 64.0, 99.8) and negative predictive value 48.6% (95% CI: 36.4, 60.8). In the other study populations, the test was negative for all pre-vaccination samples, and all samples collected before incident natural HPV16 infection. Nearly all post-vaccination samples (98.0%), and one-third of the samples after natural HPV16 infection (34.6%) tested positive in the HPV16-L1 antibody rapid test.
interpretationThe HPV16-L1 antibody test has low diagnostic accuracy and cannot reliably distinguish different sources of HPV16-L1 antibodies. Therefore, this type of assays is not suitable for screening and detection of HPV16-driven OPC.
fundingThis study is supported by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR) core bvfunding provided to DKFZ. The NRC for Papilloma- and Polyomaviruses is supported by the Ministry of Health (BMG, grant no. 1369-401).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.