ArticleMedical education2026
Does clinical exposure to different skin tones during training improve diagnostic ability?
Article in Medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does clinical exposure to different skin tones during training improve diagnostic ability?Medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have shown that medical students demonstrate poorer performance when diagnosing pathology in skin of colour (SOC) compared to white skin (WS); it is important to understand the reasons underpinning this. If not addressed, poorer differential diagnostic ability in certain skin tones could entrench existing racial inequities in health care. We investigated whether exposure to a predominant patient skin colour during clinical practice affects diagnostic ability in WS and SOC.
methodsParticipants were international medical graduates (IMGs) and medical students from Imperial College London and the University of Dundee, recruited between January and May 2024. Participants were divided into two groups, based on whether they were predominantly exposed to white patients (WP) or non-white patients (NWP) in their practice. Participants sat a dermatology quiz, in which they were asked to provide a diagnosis for 22 image-based vignettes, covering 11 clinical presentations, each shown in WS and SOC. For each of the WP and NWP exposed groups, we compared their diagnostic ability in WS and SOC presentations.
resultsA total of 411 participants were analysed; 187 predominantly exposed to WP and 224 predominantly exposed to NWP. Both groups demonstrated a statistically significantly better diagnostic ability in WS compared to SOC (p < 0.01). Overall, there was no significant difference in differential diagnostic ability in WS and SOC between the WP-exposed and NWP-exposed groups (p = 0.731). DISCUSSION: Regardless of the predominant patient skin colour participants saw in their practice, participants were worse at diagnosing pathology in SOC. This highlights that clinical exposure to SOC is not sufficient to mitigate clinicians' inferior diagnostic ability in non-white skin tones. Therefore, effort must be made to improve the diversity of skin colours represented in medical education resources, to improve clinicians' familiarity with pathology in different skin tones and minimize the risk of patients being misdiagnosed due to their skin colour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.