ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Perioperative Optimization of Frail Older Adults Undergoing Elective Colorectal Surgery.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Surgery: Centralized Risk Assessment for System-Level Impact.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH) clinic was established to address vulnerabilities and improve outcomes in frail older patients. This study describes the results of comprehensive perioperative optimization by the POSH interdisciplinary team (IDT) in patients who underwent colorectal surgery.
methodsFrail patients planned for colorectal surgery and enrolled in the POSH clinic (10/2021-09/2023) were retrospectively identified. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings of preoperative geriatric assessment and postoperative outcomes. Outcomes were compared with a contemporary propensity-matched cohort using chi-squared analysis and two-sample t-tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.
resultsThirty-six patients with a median age of 80 years and a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6.11 were planned for colorectal surgeries, most commonly colectomy (62.1%) and ostomy reversal (20.7%). Twenty-nine patients underwent surgical management after interdisciplinary optimization in the POSH clinic. The most common interventions recommended included advance care planning (86.2%), physical therapy (55.2%), and medication management (34.5%). Postoperatively, 75% of patients were discharged home, and there were no mortalities within 90 days. There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes when compared to a contemporary propensity-matched cohort. The remaining seven patients enrolled in POSH did not undergo surgical management after surgery was deemed inconsistent with their goals of care, and three of these patients expired within 1 year of evaluation in POSH.
conclusionsThe POSH model provides high-risk patients with individualized risk stratification, comprehensive interdisciplinary strategies for risk mitigation, and alignment of care with patient goals. When elective colorectal surgery was within their goals of care, frail older adults safely underwent operative intervention after careful perioperative optimization. Future studies should include a mixed-method exploration of the patient perspective and a randomized controlled trial to quantify the impact of the POSH clinic on short- and long-term postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.