Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41387005›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

Socioeconomic inequality and access to emergency care: understanding the pathways to the emergency department in the UK.

Joan Madia, Adrian A Boyle, James Ray, Alex Novak, Catherine J Pope, Bella Wheeler, Stavros Petrou, Raphael Wittenberg, Catia Nicodemo

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Yonder.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joan MadiaUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Adrian A BoyleAddenbrooke's Hospital Emergency Department, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9009-5423
James RayEmergency Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Alex NovakEmergency Medicine Research Oxford (EMROx), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-8235
Catherine J PopeUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Bella WheelerUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stavros PetrouNuffield Department of Primary Care and Health Science, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Raphael WittenbergPersonal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-2721
Catia NicodemoNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK catia.nicodemo@economics.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5490-9576

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how socioeconomic deprivation influences referral pathways to emergency departments (EDs) and to assess how these pathways affect subsequent hospital outcomes.

designRetrospective observational study.

settingEmergency department of a large teaching hospital in the East of England, providing secondary and tertiary care.

participants482 787 ED attendances by patients aged 16 years and over, recorded between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients were assigned Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) deciles based on residential postcode.

main outcome measuresReferral source (general practitioner (GP), National Health Service (NHS) 111, ambulance, self-referral, other), total ED time, 4-hour breach, hospital admission and unplanned return within 72 hours.

resultsSubstantial socioeconomic inequalities were observed in referral pathways. Patients from the most deprived areas were significantly less likely to be referred by a GP (4.7%) than those from the least deprived areas (14.7%) and more likely to arrive via ambulance (32% vs 24%). These differences persisted after adjusting for demographic, clinical and contextual variables. Ambulance referrals showed the longest ED stays, ranging from 347 to 351 min across IMD deciles (overall 95% CI 343 to 363) and the highest probability of 4-hour breaches (51%; 95% CI 50% to 53%). Self-referrals had the greatest rates of unplanned returns within 7 days (up to 7.1%; 95% CI 5.5% to 8.7%). In contrast, NHS 111 and GP referrals were associated with shorter stays, lower breach rates and fewer reattendances. Minimal variation in outcomes was observed across deprivation levels once referral source was accounted for.

conclusionsInequalities in how patients access emergency care, particularly reduced GP and NHS 111 referrals among more deprived groups, appear to underpin disparities in ED outcomes. Referral source captures important clinical and system-level factors that influence patient experience and resource use. Interventions to improve equitable access to structured referral pathways, particularly in more deprived areas, may enhance both the efficiency and fairness of emergency care delivery. Further research using national data is needed to assess broader policy implications and economic costs associated with differential access.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsState MedicineElectronic Health RecordsEmergency DepartmentsEmergency Service, HospitalHealth policyHealth Services

Identifiers

PMID41387005
PMCPMC12706212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.