ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2025
Detection method for CRISPR-Cas9 edited tomato with single nucleotide deletion using multiplex probe-based real-time PCR and confirmation of non-transgenicity: A case study.
Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome Editing in Solanaceae: Harnessing CRISPR-Cas Technology for Precision Crop Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The adoption of gene-edited (GE) food crops has increased due to applicability of technology without drastically affecting the genetic information. However, the discussion on regulatory regime pertaining to GE plants throughout the globe is overwhelming. In the countries where GE products are regulated, or for the verification of gene-editing as claimed by the developers, detection of GE plants (referred to as GE detection here) plays an imperative role. Precisely detecting small modifications in single or few nucleotide(s) is a challenge. An efficient detection method was developed for GE tomato line with a single base pair edit as deletion in Solanum lycopersicum pectate lyase (SlPL) gene for better shelf life. A stepwise strategy is reported herein, comprising of screening at early phase targeting Cas9 protein gene using rapid loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, followed by the verification of single point mutation using real-time PCR. Multiplex TaqMan® real-time PCR using fluorescent labelled dual probes simultaneously targeting edited and unedited sequences, was used for verification of single point deletion. This method was based on the negative selection where the presence of a mutation was determined by absence of signal in comparison to the wild-type. The developed multiplex real-time PCR method was found sensitive enough to detect 0.1% of the targeted lines. In view of the regulation of GM tomato in several countries, the approach for confirming non-transgenic nature of edited line was also presented using real-time PCR targeting common screening elements present in globally approved GM tomato events. This approach could be utilized as a tool globally either to support the regulatory authorities for food traceability or to verify the editing as well as to track suspected transgenic element in SDN-1 and SDN-2 types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.