Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41386547›Full record

ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026

Generalization for both diurnal and nocturnal pollination in the mass-flowering desert geophyte Nerine laticoma (Amaryllidaceae).

G L Theron, C Barker, M Castañeda-Zárate, C Diller, S Geerts, S G T Klumpers, S D Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G L TheronAgricultural Research Council, Plant Health and Protection, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-9014
C BarkerDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-1125
M Castañeda-ZárateCentre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-358X
C DillerCentre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-3299
S GeertsDepartment of Conservation and Marine Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0149-2783
S G T KlumpersCentre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-7727
S D JohnsonCentre for Functional Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Scottsville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5114-5862

Funding

Cape Peninsula University of TechnologyNational Research Foundation 46372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionary limits to generalization in plant pollination systems are often determined by trade-offs in which adaptations to one set of flower visitors reduces the effectiveness of another set of visitors. A key question is whether flowers can be pollinated equally effectively during the day and the night, given that the attractants for diurnal visitors are expected to be very different to those for nocturnal visitors. To address this question, we investigated the pollination system of the mass-flowering desert geophyte Nerine laticoma (Amaryllidaceae) over 2 years. We measured floral traits, including colour, scent, dimensions, floral rewards, visitation and reproductive traits. Finally, we exposed a subset of flowers exclusively to either diurnal or nocturnal visitors to establish their relative contributions to reproduction. Nerine laticoma has relatively open flowers, with exposed nectar, attracting a wide diversity of pollinators, including bees, butterflies, nocturnal settling moths and hawkmoths. We established that N. laticoma is reliant on pollinators for seed production. Flowers exposed only during the day set a similar number of seeds to those exposed only during the night, indicating that the plant is effectively pollinated by both diurnal and nocturnal animals. The results highlight the importance of multiple pollinators and their contribution to reproductive success in desert environments with variable pollinator communities. The contribution of all possible pollinators in a system, including frequently overlooked nocturnal visitors, should thus be taken into account.

Indexed as

AmaryllidaceaeCircadian RhythmFlowersPollinationAnimalsBeesDesert ClimateMothsReproductionSeedsBee pollinationbet hedgingbutterfly pollinationexclusion experimenthawkmoth pollinationmating systems

Identifiers

PMID41386547
PMCPMC12884022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.