ArticleProgress in neurobiology2026
Place field dynamics in retrosplenial cortex compared to hippocampus.
Article in Progress in neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The encoding, storage, and updating of memories in cortical networks are poorly understood. In retrosplenial cortex (RSC), cells respond to the animal's position as it traverses a real or virtual (VR) linear track. Most position correlated cells (PCCs) in RSC require an intact hippocampus to form, but survive subsequent hippocampal damage. To examine whether RSC and hippocampal PCCs undergo remapping and spatial tuning development in parallel or sequentially, neuronal activity in RSC or CA1 was recorded using two-photon calcium imaging in mice running on VR tracks. RSC PCC activity underwent global remapping like CA1, with approximately the same dynamics of tuning development in the novel context. However, fields in RSC did not show place field expansion, in familiar or novel environments. Thus, while most properties of global remapping are shared between RSC and CA1, place field shift and expansion are notably restricted to hippocampus. Thus, our data suggests that RSC place specificity is either not 'inherited' directly from hippocampus or the hippocampal influence on RSC PCC formation may be restricted to hippocampal spikes occurring in the early phase of the theta rhythm (and thus late within the place field).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.