Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385788›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

The 5 R's of Indigenous Research as a Framework to Co-Design and Evaluate an Outdoor Play Program in Early Learning and Child Care Centers: Protocol for the Promoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 Wait-List Control Cluster Randomized Trial.

Mariana Brussoni, Rachel Ramsden, Sheila Grieve, Dawn Mount, Emily Fox, Susan Herrington, Yingyi Lin, Stella Erasmus Johnson, Jean Lloyd, Enid Elliot and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05626595 (PROmoting Early Childhood Outside), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05626595 nacompletednot on this map

PROmoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0: A Program to Support Outdoor Play in Early Learning and Child Care Centres

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled307ConditionsChild DevelopmentArmsProject Group - PRO-ECO Project, Wait List Group - Normal Daily Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mariana BrussoniDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1495-816X
Rachel RamsdenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0741-3951
Sheila GrieveVancouver Island University, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-6591-7625
Dawn MountDepartment of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7083-9336
Emily FoxBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-4956
Susan HerringtonSchool of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7735-2387
Yingyi LinIndependent Consultant, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9485-7811
Stella Erasmus Johnson *Knowledge Keeper, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-2975-3400
Jean Lloyd *Knowledge Keeper, Christina Lake, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-3216-5213
Enid Elliot *PRO-ECO 2.0 project, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1325-585X
Emily Mlieczko *PRO-ECO 2.0 project, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-8695-631X
Andrea Lemire *PRO-ECO 2.0 project, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-9005-1502
Laranna Scott *PRO-ECO 2.0 project, Grand Forks, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-9800-0122
Ashley Barrett *PRO-ECO 2.0 project, Moberly Lake, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-0685-1556
Emma Cottier *PRO-ECO 2.0 project, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-6613-4570
Ally Rice *PRO-ECO 2.0 project, Cranbrook, BC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-3185-636X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutdoor play is a fundamental part of childhood. Children's participation in outdoor play connects them to nature and the land, and supports their role in the natural world. Early learning and child care (ELCC) centers provide opportunities for outdoor play; however, barriers toward the provision of outdoor play exist, including educator attitudes, policies and procedures, outdoor space limitations, and adverse weather conditions.

objectiveThe Promoting Early Childhood Outside (PRO-ECO) 2.0 study is a community-based research partnership with Indigenous Knowledge Keepers and Elders, Indigenous and early childhood organizations, early childhood education faculty, ELCC centers, and families, aiming to expand outdoor play in ELCC centers. This paper provides an overview of the community-based design process, guided by the 5 R's-Respect, Relevance, Responsibility, Reciprocity, and Relationship-and the resulting study protocol for the mixed methods waitlist control cluster randomized trial.

methodsThis study considered a 5 R's research approach from its inception, beginning with the formation of a Steering Committee and over a year of relationship building before formal study activities commenced. A key early focus was collaboratively identifying project values through an iterative process. Collectively, we worked to promote equity, disrupt power dynamics, and embed Indigenous data sovereignty principles into research agreements, marking a significant departure from traditional Western research processes. The PRO-ECO program and study protocol are implemented in partnership with 10 ELCC centers delivering licensed full-day, year-round care to children aged 2.5-6 years in rural and urban areas of British Columbia, Canada. The PRO-ECO program includes 4 components to address common barriers to outdoor play in ELCC settings. Primary outcome measures include the proportion and diversity of observed nature play behavior during dedicated outdoor times at ELCC centers as measured through observational behavior mapping. Secondary outcomes include changes in educator attitudes, quality of ELCC outdoor play space, and children's perspectives of their experiences at ELCC centers. Outcome data are collected at baseline, and 6 months and 12 months post baseline. The community's perspectives (educators, children, and families) on the project are assessed qualitatively to understand the acceptability of the PRO-ECO program. Mixed-effect models will test the effect of the PRO-ECO program on quantitative outcomes. Qualitative data will support the interpretation of quantitative findings and provide evidence on project acceptability.

resultsParticipant recruitment for this study began in August 2023, and data collection was completed in March 2025. A total of 229 children, 91 staff and early childhood educators, and 40 family members were recruited to participate in this study.

conclusionsThe PRO-ECO 2.0 study uses a rigorous experimental design within a community-based research project. The 5 R's approach grounded our work in shared values, disrupting traditional academic power relations and weaving together Indigenous and Western worldviews in the context of academic research.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05626595; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05626595. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/77956.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersPlay and PlaythingsChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Designcommunity-based researchearly childhood education and careindigenous data sovereigntymethodologyrisky play

Identifiers

PMID41385788
PMCPMC12743237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.