Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385778›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Hype vs Reality in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Workflows.

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Barry Solaiman, Yosra Magdi Mekki, Dena Al-Thani, Faisal Farooq, Metab Alkubeyyer, Mohamed Ziyad Abubacker, Rawan AlSaad, Sarah Aziz, Ahmed Serag and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. AI agents: a game changer in ophthalmology?Eye (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq *AI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Education City, Doha, P.O. Box 24144, Qatar, 97444928826.ORCID 0000-0001-7695-4626
Barry SolaimanCollege of Law, Hamad bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-5075
Yosra Magdi MekkiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-5146-0117
Dena Al-ThaniCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-1474-2692
Faisal FarooqQatar Computational Research Institute (QCRI), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-3551-7371
Metab AlkubeyyerDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0627-8551
Mohamed Ziyad AbubackerDepartment of Radiology, Al Ahli Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0006-7594-530X
Rawan AlSaadAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Education City, Doha, P.O. Box 24144, Qatar, 97444928826.ORCID 0000-0002-3235-0860
Sarah AzizAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Education City, Doha, P.O. Box 24144, Qatar, 97444928826.ORCID 0000-0002-0861-9743
Ahmed SeragAI Innovation Lab, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-4145-5509
Rajat ThomasWeill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-4816
Javaid SheikhAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Education City, Doha, P.O. Box 24144, Qatar, 97444928826.ORCID 0000-0002-5762-4186
Arfan Ahmed *AI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Education City, Doha, P.O. Box 24144, Qatar, 97444928826.ORCID 0000-0002-4025-5767

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the capacity to transform health care by improving clinical decision-making, optimizing workflows, and enhancing patient outcomes. However, this potential remains limited by a complex set of technological, human, and ethical barriers that constrain its safe and equitable implementation. This paper argues for a holistic, systems-based approach to AI integration that addresses these challenges as interconnected rather than isolated. It identifies key technological barriers, including limited explainability, algorithmic bias, integration and interoperability issues, lack of generalizability, and difficulties in validation. Human factors such as resistance to change, insufficient stakeholder engagement, and education and resource constraints further impede adoption, whereas ethical and legal challenges related to liability, privacy, informed consent, and inequity compound these obstacles. Addressing these issues requires transparent model design, diverse datasets, participatory development, and adaptive governance. Recommendations emerging from this synthesis are as follows: (1) establish standardized international regulatory and governance frameworks; (2) promote multidisciplinary co-design involving clinicians, developers, and patients; (3) invest in clinician education, AI literacy, and continuous training; (4) ensure equitable resource allocation through dedicated funding and public-private partnerships; (5) prioritize multimodal, explainable, and ethically aligned AI development; and (6) focus on long-term evaluation of AI in real-world settings to ensure adaptive, transparent, and inclusive deployment. Adopting these measures can align innovation with accountability, enabling health care systems to harness AI's transformative potential responsibly and sustainably to advance patient care and health equity.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceWorkflowHumansAIartificial intelligencechallengesclinical workflowethicshealth carehuman factorsregulationsolutionstechnology

Identifiers

PMID41385778
PMCPMC12700513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.