ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Hype vs Reality in the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Workflows.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: Focus on Hypertension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Pooled it
- AI integration in pediatric radiology: perspectives from international academic leaders.European radiology · 2026Article
- Review
- A Survey on Perspectives Toward Artificial Intelligence Among Italian Interventional Cardiologists.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Closing Editorial: Toward Safe, Equitable, and Intelligent Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Comment on "Toward Timely Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Revolutionizing Early Detection Through Genomics, Artificial Intelligence, and Noninvasive Biomarkers".Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- AI agents: a game changer in ophthalmology?Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Mapping the research landscape of artificial intelligence in heart failure: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Clinical AI Beyond Development: A Scoping Review of Deployment-Related Robustness, Algorithmovigilance, and Lifecycle Oversight.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Human-AI Interaction in Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Editorial: Beyond the hype: a global perspective on the real-world utility of AI in healthcare research and service delivery.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- AI competency misalignment in preventive medicine: a multi-stakeholder survey with latent profile analysis in Sichuan and Chongqing.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- High-risk without safeguards? The EU AI Act and the push for deregulation of medical AI.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Review
- The evolution of diagnostic microbiology: integrating culture-based methods and genomic advances.PeerJ · 2026Review
- Beyond health economics: economic growth, artificial intelligence, and environmental externalities in shaping life expectancy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Strengthening mental health care in Somalia through artificial intelligence: opportunities, challenges, and a roadmap for implementation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the capacity to transform health care by improving clinical decision-making, optimizing workflows, and enhancing patient outcomes. However, this potential remains limited by a complex set of technological, human, and ethical barriers that constrain its safe and equitable implementation. This paper argues for a holistic, systems-based approach to AI integration that addresses these challenges as interconnected rather than isolated. It identifies key technological barriers, including limited explainability, algorithmic bias, integration and interoperability issues, lack of generalizability, and difficulties in validation. Human factors such as resistance to change, insufficient stakeholder engagement, and education and resource constraints further impede adoption, whereas ethical and legal challenges related to liability, privacy, informed consent, and inequity compound these obstacles. Addressing these issues requires transparent model design, diverse datasets, participatory development, and adaptive governance. Recommendations emerging from this synthesis are as follows: (1) establish standardized international regulatory and governance frameworks; (2) promote multidisciplinary co-design involving clinicians, developers, and patients; (3) invest in clinician education, AI literacy, and continuous training; (4) ensure equitable resource allocation through dedicated funding and public-private partnerships; (5) prioritize multimodal, explainable, and ethically aligned AI development; and (6) focus on long-term evaluation of AI in real-world settings to ensure adaptive, transparent, and inclusive deployment. Adopting these measures can align innovation with accountability, enabling health care systems to harness AI's transformative potential responsibly and sustainably to advance patient care and health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.