Observational studyJMIR formative research2025
Factors Associated With Suicidal Ideation Among Persons With Disabilities in South Korea: Retrospective Observational Study.
Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: South Korea has the highest suicide rate among the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development nations, with particularly elevated figures among persons with disabilities. Research has shown a strong correlation between suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors that contribute to suicidal ideation among persons with disabilities in South Korea, utilizing machine learning methods based on national survey data. Methods: We employed data from the 2020 National Survey on Persons with Disabilities in South Korea, which included 7025 respondents. The primary variable of interest was the answer to the question, "have you thought about taking your own life in the past year?" The dataset was divided into training (80%) and test (20%) subsets. Because the survey contained too many questions (n=1394), feature selection was conducted using random forest variable importance to identify the top 100 features. Subsequently, 5 machine learning models were trained to predict suicidal ideation based on the selected features: logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and feed-forward neural network. Results: A total of 6832 persons with disabilities responded to the suicidal ideation question and were included in the study. The most common types of primary disability were physical disability (n=1773, 26.0%) and hearing disability (n=979, 14.3%). Of the 6832 persons with disabilities, 12.1% (n=829) indicated they had had suicidal thoughts in the past year. Significant factors that impacted suicidal ideation included intense feelings of sadness, difficulties associated with their disabilities, and overall health satisfaction. Among the models tested, the random forest model exhibited the best predictive performance with a median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.905 (IQR 0.895-0.913), a median precision of 0.592 (IQR 0.561-0.616), and a median recall of 0.588 (IQR 0.564-0.620). Conclusions: This study highlights critical predictors of suicidal ideation in persons with disabilities in South Korea, underscoring the necessity for focused mental health interventions. The results demonstrate the potential of machine learning to identify these factors, which can aid in the development of future suicide prevention strategies. Future work is warranted to investigate if the factors identified in this study are causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.