Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385595›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026

The role of central versus peripheral opioid receptors in fentanyl-induced brain hypoxia.

Eugene A Kiyatkin, Feonil G Limiac, Michael R Noya, Juan L Gomez, Michael Michaelides, Yavin Shaham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eugene A KiyatkinBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Department of Human and Health Services, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3744-0873
Feonil G LimiacBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Department of Human and Health Services, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-5180-8948
Michael R NoyaBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Department of Human and Health Services, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Juan L GomezBiobehavioral Imaging and Molecular Neuropsychopharmacology Section, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Department of Human and Health Services, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-9904
Michael MichaelidesBiobehavioral Imaging and Molecular Neuropsychopharmacology Section, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Department of Human and Health Services, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Yavin ShahamBehavioral Neuroscience Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Department of Human and Health Services, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.

Funding

Electrophysiological and electrochemical studues of addictive drugsZIADA000566 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI KIYATKIN, EUGENE A · 2010 to 2025
$10.1M
HHS | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 1ZIADA000566-12HHS | NIH | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) NIH 2008 Z01 DAIntramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naloxone is the prototypical opioid receptor antagonist, whereas naloxone-methiodide, a quaternary naloxone analog, is widely used as a peripherally restricted antagonist based on the assumption that it does not cross the blood-brain barrier. This assumption has been central to arguments that peripheral opioid receptors contribute to fentanyl-induced respiratory depression. However, mass spectrometry studies show that although naloxone-methiodide has very limited permeability, it is detectable in brain tissue at an ∼1:50 concentration ratio compared with naloxone. Even such small amounts may be sufficient to act on brain receptors, raising the possibility of central involvement. To test this hypothesis, we used oxygen sensors coupled with amperometry in freely moving rats to examine the roles of central versus peripheral opioid receptors in fentanyl-induced brain hypoxia. We compared naloxone with naloxone-methiodide on oxygen responses in the brain and subcutaneous space following intravenous fentanyl administration (30 µg/kg). Naloxone-methiodide at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg (but not 0.2 mg/kg) blocked fentanyl-induced hypoxia. Naloxone-methiodide's effect was weaker and shorter than that produced by 0.2 mg/kg naloxone. In addition, naloxone at doses 50- and 250-times lower (0.04 and 0.008 mg/kg), but not 1,000-times lower (0.002 mg/kg), also blocked fentanyl-induced hypoxia, mimicking the effect of 2.0 mg/kg naloxone-methiodide. These findings suggest that naloxone-methiodide is not a strictly peripheral antagonist. At moderate to high doses, naloxone-methiodide's ability to reverse fentanyl-induced hypoxia may be partially mediated by the drug's action on central opioid receptors.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBrainFentanylHypoxia, BrainNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, OpioidAnimalsMaleOxygenQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsN-methylnaloxoneOxygenQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsReceptors, Opioidbrain hypoxianaloxonenaloxone-methiodideopioidsperipheral vasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID41385595
PMCPMC12805833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.