ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
The role of central versus peripheral opioid receptors in fentanyl-induced brain hypoxia.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fentanyl decreases arterial blood oxygen saturation more than furanylfentanyl in mice due to increased apnea.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Naloxone is the prototypical opioid receptor antagonist, whereas naloxone-methiodide, a quaternary naloxone analog, is widely used as a peripherally restricted antagonist based on the assumption that it does not cross the blood-brain barrier. This assumption has been central to arguments that peripheral opioid receptors contribute to fentanyl-induced respiratory depression. However, mass spectrometry studies show that although naloxone-methiodide has very limited permeability, it is detectable in brain tissue at an ∼1:50 concentration ratio compared with naloxone. Even such small amounts may be sufficient to act on brain receptors, raising the possibility of central involvement. To test this hypothesis, we used oxygen sensors coupled with amperometry in freely moving rats to examine the roles of central versus peripheral opioid receptors in fentanyl-induced brain hypoxia. We compared naloxone with naloxone-methiodide on oxygen responses in the brain and subcutaneous space following intravenous fentanyl administration (30 µg/kg). Naloxone-methiodide at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg (but not 0.2 mg/kg) blocked fentanyl-induced hypoxia. Naloxone-methiodide's effect was weaker and shorter than that produced by 0.2 mg/kg naloxone. In addition, naloxone at doses 50- and 250-times lower (0.04 and 0.008 mg/kg), but not 1,000-times lower (0.002 mg/kg), also blocked fentanyl-induced hypoxia, mimicking the effect of 2.0 mg/kg naloxone-methiodide. These findings suggest that naloxone-methiodide is not a strictly peripheral antagonist. At moderate to high doses, naloxone-methiodide's ability to reverse fentanyl-induced hypoxia may be partially mediated by the drug's action on central opioid receptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.