Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385567›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Reviving Vavilov's vision: The tragedy of biodiversity governance and principles for reform.

David J Bertioli, Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli, Tarikua Erda, Charles E Simpson, Scott Barrett, Peter H Raven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David J BertioliInstitute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.ORCID 0000-0003-0294-7284
Soraya C M Leal-BertioliInstitute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.ORCID 0000-0002-9683-5357
Tarikua ErdaLeonard N. Stern School of Business, Finance Department, New York University, New York, NY 10012.ORCID 0009-0003-1498-5867
Charles E SimpsonTexas AgriLife Research, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, Stephenville, TX 76401.
Scott BarrettSchool of International and Public Affairs, The Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Peter H RavenMissouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO 63110.ORCID 0000-0002-8536-2646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective addresses two of humanity's greatest challenges: feeding a growing population and conserving biodiversity. We begin by examining the legacy of Nikolai Vavilov, who pioneered the improvement of crops such as wheat and beans by hybridizing them with their wild relatives. This strategy used wild species biodiversity to introduce new genetic variation into crops, making them more resilient and productive. Its adoption around the world greatly increased food security and brought lasting benefits to humanity. However, since the 1990 s, well-intentioned laws shifted the governance of biodiversity from a shared global resource to the sovereign control of nation states, with serious unintended consequences. These changes have disrupted the collection, preservation, exchange, and use of biodiversity, all of which are central to Vavilov's strategy for crop improvement and to biodiversity science more broadly. Efforts at reform have been frustrated as the issues became moralized, inhibiting the open dialogue needed for change. Using foundational concepts shared by science and good governance, we propose seven empirically grounded principles for reform, to help realign biodiversity governance with its intended aims. We then illustrate one possible framework-underpinned by global financing to protect biodiversity hotspots-that would align incentives and work in synergy with the principles to foster practical reform. The principles, together with frameworks that align incentives, would create the conditions for stronger biodiversity conservation and research, agricultural development, global food security, and all the associated benefits to humanity.

Indexed as

AgricultureBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesCrops, AgriculturalHumansbiodiversitygermplasmgovernance

Identifiers

PMID41385567
PMCPMC12745805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.