ArticlePloS one2025
Physician-physician handover from acute care to rehabilitation setting: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this scoping review is to map the existing evidence that describes strategies to improve handover from the acute care to rehabilitation settings.
introductionPoor handover processes have been associated with preventable errors, delays in care, and adverse patient outcomes. Effective physician-to-physician handover during transitions of care is critical to ensuring patient safety and optimizing clinical outcomes. Physician handover between acute and rehabilitation care settings is particularly complicated, as it requires transferring detailed and timely information for continuity of care for medically and/or surgically complex patients between components of healthcare systems with different cultures and goals of care. Despite numerous studies being published on handover, there has yet to be a synthesis of the existing literature that seeks to explore handovers across acute to rehabilitation settings as well as how care transitions can be improved. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence on physician-to-physician handover from acute care to rehabilitation.
methodsThis review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A comprehensive search will be performed across the following electronic databases: MEDLINE(R) ALL (Ovid), Embase Classic + Embase (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO) and Web of Science (Clarivate). All rounds of screening, data extraction, and data synthesis will be conducted independently with each stage performed in duplicate. The extracted data will be summarized both quantitively with descriptive statistics and qualitatively using content analysis. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English that discuss physician-physician handover from acute care to rehabilitation settings will be included. All geographical areas will be considered. Case reports, case series, commentaries, protocols, opinion pieces (editorials), or abstracts from conferences will be excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.