ArticlePloS one2025
Redirecting patients from the pediatric emergency department to community locations for care: A qualitative study of healthcare professional and leader perspectives.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEmergency department (ED) to community (ED2C) programs, which redirect patients from the pediatric ED to community healthcare professionals represent a promising strategy to reduce the impact of non-urgent visits on the pediatric ED. Given an ED2C program's potential impact on various care professionals, we completed a qualitative study to explore key informants' attitudes and perceptions of pediatric ED2C programs.
methodsWe conducted one-on-one semi-structured interviews with key informants in British Columbia, Canada. Participants included: pediatric ED staff - triage nurses and physicians; community professionals - pediatricians and family physicians; and health system leaders responsible for pediatric and emergency care in British Columbia. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, de-identified, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis within an interpretive description framework. A visual model was developed to depict key themes in attitudes and perceptions towards pediatric ED2C programs.
resultsWe interviewed 24 participants: 6 community professionals, 11 pediatric ED professionals, and 7 healthcare leaders. Participants viewed the ED2C program as a valuable solution to address pediatric system strain provided that systemic barriers are addressed, and both emergency and community settings are equipped with adequate training and resources. Participants emphasized the need for clear guidelines on eligibility and operations to build confidence and enhance program effectiveness.
conclusionsOur findings suggest there is support for ED2C programs as a means to reduce the impact of non-urgent pediatric ED visits and strengthen community-based care. Successful implementation will require coordinated planning, resource investment, and clear operational frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.