ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2026
Differentiable Forward and Back-Projector for Rigid Motion Estimation in X-Ray Imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Joint Cone-Beam CT Reconstruction and Rigid Motion Compensation Using A Differentiable Projector.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn this work, we propose a framework for differentiable forward and back-projector that enables scalable, accurate, and memory-efficient gradient computation for rigid motion estimation tasks.
methodsUnlike existing approaches that rely on auto-differentiation or that are restricted to specific projector types, our method is based on a general analytical gradient formulation for forward/backprojection in the continuous domain. A key insight is that the gradients of both forward and back-projection can be expressed directly in terms of the forward and back-projection operations themselves, providing a unified gradient computation scheme across different projector types. Leveraging this analytical formulation, we develop a discretized implementation with an acceleration strategy that balances computational speed and memory usage.
resultsSimulation studies illustrate the numerical accuracy and computational efficiency of the proposed algorithm. Experiments demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach for multiple X-ray imaging tasks we conducted. In 2D/3D registration, the proposed method achieves $\sim 8\times$ speedup over an existing differentiable forward projector while maintaining comparable accuracy. In motion-compensated analytical reconstruction and cone-beam CT geometry calibration, the proposed method enhances image sharpness and structural fidelity on real phantom data while showing significant efficiency advantages over existing gradient-free and gradient-based solutions.
conclusionThe proposed differentiable projectors enable effective and efficient gradient-based solutions for X-ray imaging tasks requiring rigid motion estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.