Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385283›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2025

Token-splitting improves GPT-4.1 performance on plastic surgery exams: implications for AI-Assisted medical education.

Yung-Hsu Lei, Chien-Chung Chen, Ching-Ju Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yung-Hsu LeiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1721-4262
Chien-Chung ChenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ching-Ju ShenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have demonstrated impressive performance on general medical examinations; however, their effectiveness significantly declines in specialized board examinations due to limited domain-specific training data and computational constraints inherent to their self-attention mechanisms. This study investigates a novel token-splitting strategy informed by Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), aimed at overcoming these limitations by optimizing cognitive processing and enhancing knowledge retention in specialized educational contexts. We implemented a token-splitting approach by segmenting Taiwan plastic surgery board examination materials and associated textbook content into cognitively manageable segments ranging from 4,000 to 20,000 tokens. These segmented inputs were provided to GPT-4.1 via its standard ChatGPT web interface. Model performance was rigorously evaluated, comparing accuracy and efficiency across various token lengths and question complexities classified according to Bloom's taxonomy.The GPT-4.1 model utilizing the token-splitting strategy significantly outperformed the baseline (unmodified) model, achieving notably higher accuracy. The optimal segmentation length was determined to be 6,000 tokens, effectively balancing cognitive coherence with information retention and model attention. Errors observed at this optimal length primarily resulted from content absent from textual materials or requiring multimodal interpretation (e.g., image-based reasoning). Provided relevant textual content was adequately segmented, GPT-4.1 consistently demonstrated high accuracy (From 75.88% to 92.93%). The findings highlight that a token-splitting approach, grounded in Cognitive Load Theory, significantly enhances LLM performance on specialized medical board examinations. This accessible, user-friendly strategy provides educators and clinicians with a practical means to improve AI-assisted education outcomes without requiring complex technical skills or infrastructure. Future research and development integrating multimodal capabilities and adaptive segmentation strategies promise to further optimize educational applications and clinical decision-making support.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducational MeasurementEducation, MedicalSurgery, PlasticCognitionHumansTaiwanartificial intelligence (AI)ChatGPTlarge language models (LLMs)medical educationteaching/learning strategies

Identifiers

PMID41385283
PMCPMC12704135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.