Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385180›Full record

ArticleResearch in health services & regions2025

Adapting the German demand planning guideline for physiotherapy: a cross-sectional analysis from Lower Saxony.

Anne Griese, Frank Schüssler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in health services & regions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne GrieseInstitute of Midwifery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany. anne.griese@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2947-9710
Frank SchüsslerInstitute for Applied Photogrammetry and Geoinformatics, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Demand Planning Guideline aims to ensure equitable and needs-based outpatient care in Germany but currently excludes allied health professions such as physiotherapy. This study investigates current and projected regional supply levels of physiotherapists in Lower Saxony, a federal state in Germany, applying the physician-based planning methodology to highlight workforce imbalances.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used administrative address data from January 2021 to determine the number and distribution of physiotherapists. These data were geolinked at the district level and combined with population projections for 2040 from the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR). The methodology of the Demand Planning Guideline was applied, including age-adjusted correction factors, to assess regional care levels and future trends.

resultsSignificant regional variation in supply was found. In 2020, no district was formally undersupplied, but corrected supply levels ranged from 55.7% to 146.4%. By 2040, assuming a constant workforce, disparities are expected to increase, with 17 districts becoming oversupplied and none formally falling below the 50% threshold, despite indications of structural undersupply in several areas.

conclusionAdapting the Demand Planning Guideline to include physiotherapy enables the identification of regional supply disparities and better forecasts of future care needs. A more inclusive planning framework is required to ensure equitable access and sustainable care provision in light of demographic change.

Indexed as

Healthcare planningHealth geographyPhysiotherapySupply and demandWorkforce distribution

Identifiers

PMID41385180
PMCPMC12701200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.