ArticleFamilial cancer2025
"Choosing the main character": healthcare professionals' attitudes towards counselling patients about risk disclosure to relatives in the era of mainstream cancer genetic testing.
Article in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study explored healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward counselling patients on disclosing genetic cancer risk to relatives. Genetic counselling practices in Sweden are undergoing significant changes due to the increased use of genetic testing to assess hereditary risk and the implementation of mainstreamed testing in oncology care. These developments require an assessment of healthcare professionals’ perceived roles and responsibilities when working with patients with hereditary risk. Best practices need to be developed to effectively support risk disclosure, and subsequently risk management, to relatives.
methodData was collected through interviews with oncologists, gynaecologists, surgeons, clinical geneticists, and genetic counsellors, working in oncology care or at cancer genetics units. Data was analysed using reflective thematic analysis.
resultsThe results are presented as four positions that healthcare professionals take, describing their attitudes towards counselling patients about risk disclosure to relatives. The position depends on whether they perceive healthcare or the patient as ultimately responsible for risk information reaching relatives, and whether their focus is on the patient or the at-risk relatives. There are several stakeholders involved, and hence 'characters in play'.
conclusionThese results could serve as a basis for discussions on roles and responsibilities, while developing best practices regarding genetic counselling on hereditary cancer risk communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.