Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385137›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2025

Workplace Outcomes After Mental Health Disclosure: The Critical Influence of Supervisor Reactions.

Ivan Volkov, Dianne M Sheppard, Andrea Kirk-Brown, Pieter Van Dijk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivan VolkovSuperFriend, Level 2, 157 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. ivan.volkov@superfriend.com.au.
Dianne M SheppardSuperFriend, Level 2, 157 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-1740
Andrea Kirk-BrownDepartment of Management, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0348-2239
Pieter Van DijkDepartment of Management, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3110-9848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDisclosure of mental health condition to a supervisor at work can have positive and negative consequences. However, research on the association between disclosure and employee work outcomes is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the employee experiences during the disclosure process (positive/negative) and work ability, intent to stay, and perceived mental health stigma among Australian workers.

methodsA mixed-methods study design was carried out with cross-sectional survey data from a nationally representative sample of Australian employees (n = 322). Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses categorised the perceived nature of supervisor responses from the employee perspective into positive and negative with further subcategories for each, and subsequent quantitative analyses investigated the association between immediate supervisors' reactions to employees' mental health disclosures and work outcomes. Statistical comparisons contrasted those experiencing positive and negative disclosure responses.

resultsThe study found positive disclosure experiences to be more common than the negative. Expressing concern, listening attentively, and demonstrating empathy were the most widely reported positive experiences, while making judgmental and condescending remarks were the most common negative experiences. Positive disclosure experiences were significantly associated with higher work ability, intent to stay and lower perceived mental health stigma.

conclusionsSupervisor reactions to employee mental health condition disclosure were found to be significantly associated with work ability, intent to stay, and perceived mental health stigma at work for disclosing employees. Noting the limitations surrounding making causal inferences, these findings emphasise the pivotal role of the supervisor in facilitating a positively perceived disclosure experience that is associated with positive employee outcomes and well-being following disclosure. In particular, training to prepare for disclosure events and respond appropriately could be an effective approach to create a work environment in which employees feel safe to disclose, actively reduce mental health stigma in the workplace, and improve work outcomes.

Indexed as

DisclosureMental healthStigmaSupervisor supportWork outcomesWorkplace culture

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.