ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Does the interfascial temporalis flap increase muscle atrophy in pterional craniotomy? a comparative study with myocutaneous flap technique.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pterional approach remains a cornerstone in skull base neurosurgery, offering extensive access to the anterior and middle cranial fossae. Various surgical modifications have been proposed to optimize surgical exposure. One modification is the interfascial temporalis flap technique, which seeks to overcome the limitations of the traditional myocutaneous flap. This study aims to evaluate whether the enhanced exposure provided by the interfascial technique is associated with increased delayed postoperative temporalis muscle atrophy compared to the myocutaneous flap in patients undergoing pterional craniotomy. A retrospective analysis of 66 patients was conducted. Of these, 36 underwent muscle mobilization using the interfascial flap and 30 with the myocutaneous flap. Temporalis muscle volume was assessed at 4-9 months postoperatively using thin-slice axial CT scans and 3D Slicer software. The percentage of muscle preservation was defined as the volume ratio of the operated side to the contralateral non-operated side, multiplied by 100. The interfascial group showed higher muscle preservation (mean 76.6%) compared to the myocutaneous group (mean 69.0%) (p = 0.01). No significant differences were found in demographic or clinical parameters, including age, ICU stay, follow-up imaging time, or hospitalization. Importantly, no cases of permanent frontal branch palsy were identified in either group at the 3-month follow-up. Interfascial temporalis flap technique is associated with better temporalis muscle preservation and less atrophy compared to the myocutaneous flap. In other words, increased exposure provided by interfascial temporalis flap doesn't come at the expense of late temporalis muscle atrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41385112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.