SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in HR + and HER2-negative breast cancer; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the landscape of Chinese patent medicines in breast cancer: a multi-database bibliometric analysis (1991-2025).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel in Advanced, Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction Methodology to Identify Best Overall Survival.Oncology research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for the treatment of Hormone Receptor/ Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HR + /HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared several treatment regimens and patient groups.
methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched (PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane from inception to 5 April 2025) to identify the studies that compared abemaciclib plus ET to ET alone. The measure effects used were hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), while risk ratios (RR) for objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and adverse effects· Forest plots were created using a random effects model, with a p-value < 0·05 was considered statistically significant. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251009464).
resultsWe included fourteen studies comprising 16,116 patients (8592 with abemaciclib plus ET and 7524 with ET alone), abemaciclib plus ET significantly improved PFS (HR 0·54; 95% CI 0·49-0·59, p = 0·00001), IDFS (HR 0·68; 95% CI 0·59-0·78, p = 0·00001), ORR (RR 2·87; 95% CI 1·85-4·44, p = 0·0001), and CBR (RR 1·32; 95% CI 1·14-1·52, p = 0·0002), and a non-statistically significant OS (HR of 0·86; 95% CI 0·74-1·01, p = 0·06). Abemaciclib increased the risk of adverse events; cardiovascular events (4·82 times), increased blood creatinine (8·51 times), nausea (1·95 times), vomiting (2·51 times), abdominal pain (2·64 times), decreased appetite (2·59 times), diarrhea (4·20 times), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (2·15 times), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (2·28 times), anemia (3·79 times), thrombocytopenia (5·73 times), leukopenia (5·48 times), neutropenia (8·74 times)· However, it showed a reduced risk of arthralgia (0·73 times).
conclusionThe combination therapy provides a clinically significant improvement in survival and treatment responses, even though the toxicity is increased but manageable, and requires careful prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41385109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.