ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2025
Enhanced temporal encoding-decoding for survival analysis of multimodal clinical data in smart healthcare.
Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid deep learning time-to-event modeling of major adverse cardiovascular events using coronary artery calcium score scans.European journal of radiology artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective survival analysis is essential for identifying optimal preventive treatments within smart healthcare systems and leveraging digital health advancements; however, existing prediction models face limitations, primarily relying on ensemble classification techniques with suboptimal performance in both target detection and predictive accuracy. To address these gaps, this paper proposes a multimodal framework that integrates enhanced facial feature detection and temporal predictive modeling. For facial feature extraction, this study developed a lightweight face-region convolutional neural network (FRegNet) specialized in detecting key facial components, such as eyes and lips in clinical patients that incorporates a residual backbone (Rstem) to enhance feature representation and a facial path aggregated feature pyramid network for multi-resolution feature fusion; comparative experiments reveal that FRegNet outperforms state-of-the-art target detection algorithms, achieving average precision (AP) of 0.922, average recall of 0.933, mean average precision (mAP) of 0.987, and precision of 0.98-significantly surpassing other mask region-based convolutional neural networks (RCNN) variants, such as mask RCNN-ResNeXt with AP of 0.789 and mAP of 0.957. Based on the extracted facial features and clinical physiological indicators, this study proposes an enhanced temporal encoding-decoding (ETED) model that integrates an adaptive attention mechanism and a gated weighting mechanism to improve predictive performance, with comparative results demonstrating that the ETED variant incorporating facial features (ETEncoding-Decoding-Face) outperforms traditional models, achieving an accuracy of 0.916, precision of 0.850, recall of 0.895, F1 of 0.884, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.947-outperforming gradient boosting with an accuracy of 0.922, but AUC of 0.669, and other classifiers in comprehensive metrics. The results confirm that the multimodal dataset (facial features + physiological indicators) significantly enhances the prediction accuracy of the seven-day survival conditions of patients. Correlation analysis reveals that chronic health evaluation and mean arterial pressure are positively correlated with survival, while temperature, Glasgow Coma Scale, and fibrinogen are negatively correlated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.