ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Exploration of common therapeutic targets for diabetic nephropathy and diabetic foot ulcers by integrated bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM), the ninth leading cause of death worldwide, is characterized by a relative or absolute deficiency of insulin, leading to increased production of advanced glycosylation end-products (AGEs), which further enhances oxidative and nitrosative stress, often leading to a variety of macrovascular and microvascular complications, such as diabetic nephropathy (DN), retinopathy, and neuropathy. Especially, diabetic patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) usually have concomitant severe peripheral arterial disease. Unfortunately, there is still no effective therapeutic treatment for DM patients combined with DN and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Thus, we performed a series of bioinformatics analyses to investigated the molecular mechanisms involved in the occurrence of these two complications. We screened for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, namely GSE96804 and GSE134431, and conducted enrichment and protein-protein interaction analyses. Subsequently, we constructed animal models of these two diseases in vivo, and validated the predictions' accuracy using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) experiments to confirm the expression levels of mRNA. Finally, we conducted protein-chemical interactions and drug prediction. We identified 104 DEGs, with many of them being involved in inflammation or lipid metabolism. We obtained 7 hub genes closely related to DN and DFU, and verified through animal experiments that the expression trends of 5 of them (NID2, LUM, ECM, LTBP1 and LRRC2) were consistent with the results of bioinformatics analysis. Notably, our study showed that sex hormones including pirinixic acid, testosterone enanthate, and progesterone were predicted to be the most promising drugs, with the combined score of the three being the highest. This finding may potentially provide common therapeutic targets for DN and DFU. Additionally, it is important to understand these networks and hub genes to advance our understanding of the multifaceted complications of DM and the future development of drugs to treat these complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41385029What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.