ArticleMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2025
Virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided secondary reconstruction of the mandibular condyle after malunion: from "unpredictable" to precise? -accuracy and outcomes.
Article in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients with malunited condylar fractures of the mandible surgical intervention is preferred when malocclusion and compromised masticatory function occur. This study evaluated the accuracy and clinical utility of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and CAD/CAM fabricated patient-specific implants (PSIs) for the secondary correction of post-traumatic mandibular condyle deformities.
methodsAccuracy of condylar segment repositioning was quantified by comparing the virtually planned joint surface with the actual postoperative same surface of the condylar head using Mimics and 3-Matic software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Deviation was calculated by two methods: the Part Comparison Analysis (PCA) function of the analysis software and by measuring distances between four corresponding reference points on the planned and final segments.
resultsThe mean deviation between planned and final joint surfaces was 2.27 mm (range 4.69) with the PCA method and 2.56 mm (range: 8.99) with the reference-point method. No significant difference was observed between high and low condylar osteotomies. Accuracy was greatest along the lateromedial axis (1.83 mm; range: 6.98 mm) and lowest in the craniocaudal axis (3.30 mm; range: 6.75 mm). A good postoperative mandibular mobility was assessed in most cases with an average active mouth opening of 37 mm and no permanent sensory impairment was reported.
conclusionVirtual surgical planning combined with CAD/CAM PSIs provides a reliable option for secondary reduction and fixation of condylar fragments, achieving high positional accuracy, good postoperative mandibular mobility, and a low rate of major complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.