Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385022›Full record

ArticleMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2025

Virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided secondary reconstruction of the mandibular condyle after malunion: from "unpredictable" to precise? -accuracy and outcomes.

Paris Georgios Liokatis, Carl Peter Cornelius, Jens Tobias Hartung, Ina Dewenter, Wenko Smolka, Florian Andreas Probst, Philipp Poxleitner, Sven Otto, Katharina Theresa Obermeier, Yoana Malenova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paris Georgios LiokatisDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Carl Peter CorneliusDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Jens Tobias HartungDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Ina DewenterDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Wenko SmolkaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Florian Andreas ProbstDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Philipp PoxleitnerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Sven OttoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Katharina Theresa ObermeierDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
Yoana MalenovaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Facial Plastic Surgery, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany. yoana.malenova@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with malunited condylar fractures of the mandible surgical intervention is preferred when malocclusion and compromised masticatory function occur. This study evaluated the accuracy and clinical utility of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and CAD/CAM fabricated patient-specific implants (PSIs) for the secondary correction of post-traumatic mandibular condyle deformities.

methodsAccuracy of condylar segment repositioning was quantified by comparing the virtually planned joint surface with the actual postoperative same surface of the condylar head using Mimics and 3-Matic software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Deviation was calculated by two methods: the Part Comparison Analysis (PCA) function of the analysis software and by measuring distances between four corresponding reference points on the planned and final segments.

resultsThe mean deviation between planned and final joint surfaces was 2.27 mm (range 4.69) with the PCA method and 2.56 mm (range: 8.99) with the reference-point method. No significant difference was observed between high and low condylar osteotomies. Accuracy was greatest along the lateromedial axis (1.83 mm; range: 6.98 mm) and lowest in the craniocaudal axis (3.30 mm; range: 6.75 mm). A good postoperative mandibular mobility was assessed in most cases with an average active mouth opening of 37 mm and no permanent sensory impairment was reported.

conclusionVirtual surgical planning combined with CAD/CAM PSIs provides a reliable option for secondary reduction and fixation of condylar fragments, achieving high positional accuracy, good postoperative mandibular mobility, and a low rate of major complications.

Indexed as

AccuracyCAD/CAMCondylar fractureVirtual planning

Identifiers

PMID41385022
PMCPMC12701210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.