Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41385011›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2025

Resilience and loneliness among older adults: an analysis using decision tree techniques.

Ali Khatib, Akram Gazerani, Peiman Fereidouni Sarijeh, Mohammadmahdi Pazhavand, Mohammad Amin Ebrahimi, Bahareh Ranjbari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali KhatibDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Healthy Ageing Research Centre, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-3905
Akram GazeraniDepartment of Operating Room, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-377X
Peiman Fereidouni SarijehFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. peimanfereidounisarijeh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-335X
Mohammadmahdi PazhavandMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, PhD Student in Medical Ethics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-5252
Mohammad Amin EbrahimiClinical Research Development Unit, Vasei Hospital, Student Research Committee, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-613X
Bahareh RanjbariNursing Expert, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAging is accompanied by profound biological, psychological, and social changes, and loneliness is considered one of the essential factors threatening the mental health of the elderly. Resilience, as a vital psychological mechanism, is the ability of an individual to effectively cope with stress and return to psychological balance after difficult situations. present study aimed to investigate the relationship between resilience and loneliness in the elderly and identify the factors affecting this relationship using a decision tree.

methodA descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted with 1400 elderly people aged 60 and older in Tehran. Data were collected using the Resilience Questionnaire (CD-RISC-25) and the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale (SELSA-S) and analyzed using the CART decision tree. SPSS v. 22 software was used for analysis.

resultBased on decision tree analysis using the CART method, elderly with a resilience score of ≤ 74.5 show a higher mean loneliness (53.42 ± 12.02). elderly with a social score higher than 12.5, the mean loneliness was 62.21 ± 4.82, while in the elderly with a lower score, the mean loneliness was lower 41.62.8.01. Individuals with a romantic dimension score of ≤ 12.5 had a very low mean loneliness of 27.53 ± 6.91, while individuals with a higher score experienced a mean of 54.93 ± 9.28. overall accuracy of the model for the high and low loneliness groups was 86.90% and 85.12%, respectively.

conclusionThe present findings emphasize that strengthening individual resilience, along with promoting social and family support and paying attention to emotional relationships, is effective in reducing loneliness in older people.

Indexed as

AgingDecision TreesLonelinessResilience, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedFamily supportLonelinessPsychologicalResilienceSocial support

Identifiers

PMID41385011
PMCPMC12775117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.