ReviewJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Program of quality improvement for extracorporeal blood purification therapies in the intensive care unit.
Review in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critically ill patients often require complex extracorporeal treatments, such as extracorporeal blood purification (EBP). At the bedside, there can be reluctance or uncertainty about when to initiate EBP, and there is no standard agreement on which goals to pursue, what prescriptions to use to achieve those goals, or which recommendations to follow to prevent complications. Furthermore, an accurate analysis of why clinical goals are not achieved or how often the patient should be reassessed to readjust the EBP prescription is not currently standardized. This narrative review describes the main actions characterizing a quality improvement program for EBP in the ICU, which took place at the University of Florence and was subsequently adopted at the national level. The pillars of this program were: (1) definition, implementation, and dissemination of information and communication technology tools aimed at objectively measuring results at the bedside, supporting dynamic prescribing and precision medicine, and promoting advances in knowledge in this field; (2) creation of a national multi-professional network of clinical users and researchers in EBP; (3) promotion and maintenance of technical and non-technical skills in EBP based on the reformulation of advanced academic training in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.