ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2025
Exploring the Pathogens in Primary Predominantly Antibody Deficiencies of Unknown Genetic Origin.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and immunologic features of adult primary antibody deficiency according to IVIGRT exposure.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPrimary 'predominantly antibody deficiencies' (PADs) are rare disorders characterized by increased susceptibility to infections, autoimmunity, allergies, and malignancies. Their low prevalence and heterogeneity often delay diagnosis, increasing morbidity and mortality. This study identifies infection patterns in PAD patients and analyzes predictors of bronchiectasis presence at PAD diagnosis (BPAD), aiming to facilitate early diagnosis and improve prognosis.
methodsUsing fully monitored data on PAD patients without identified genetic origin from the ESID Registry, infection types and pathogens across PADs were compared (chi-square analysis) and predictive factors for BPAD were identified (generalized mixed-effects logistic regression). Additionally, five machine learning classifiers (logistic regression, (bagged) decision tree, random forest and support vector machines) were trained and evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), confusion matrices and F1-score.
resultsRecurrent respiratory infections were predominant in our cohort of 861 patients from 11 centers. Cultures were conducted in only 5.9-12.3% of infections. Encapsulated bacteria were most frequently isolated. The number of organ systems affected by recurrent infections, occurrence of specific serious bacterial infections, number of identified encapsulated bacteria and common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) diagnosis were predictive of BPAD. Machine learning models achieved moderate discrimination (ROC-AUC range 0.679-0.746). DISCUSSION: This study highlights the predominance of recurrent and encapsulated bacterial respiratory tract infections in PAD and the underutilization of microbiological cultures. Generalized mixed-effects logistic regression best predicted BPAD. Clinicians should consider immunologic evaluation in patients presenting with serious bacterial infections, multi-system recurrent infections or the repeated isolation of encapsulated bacteria in unusually severe or recurrent infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.