ArticleSurgery today2026
One-stage minimally invasive surgery is as safe and feasible as two-stage surgery for perforated choledochal cyst in pediatric patients who are hemodynamically stable.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To contribute to the evolving evidence guiding the optimal management of perforated choledochal cyst (PCC), a rare but serious complication of choledochal cyst. We reviewed data from 10 patients with PCC treated at our institution between 2004 and 2024. The patients were categorized into a two-stage (n = 5) group and a one-stage group (n = 5). Surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were compared. The operative time was significantly longer in the one-stage group than in the two-stage group (353 min vs. 282 min, respectively; p = 0.006), whereas blood loss was comparable between the groups. Open surgery was more frequent in the two-stage group than the one-stage group (80% vs. 0%; p = 0.048). Early complications occurred in 40% and 20% of the patients in the two-stage and one-stage groups, respectively (p = 1.000). Anastomotic leakage occurred in one patient from each group. The hospital stay was significantly longer in the two-stage group than in the one-stage group. The late complication incidence did not differ significantly between the groups. Our findings suggest that one-stage surgery is a safe and effective option for PCC in patients who are clinically stable and when performed by experienced surgeons. These findings may assist in the management of PCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41384978What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.