ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
The diagnostic accuracy of a practical morphometric ratio on MRI for the discoid lateral meniscus.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardized MRI nomenclature for knee meniscal lesions: SSR consensus panel report.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Introduction to the special issue on imaging of the knee.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Association of knee osseous morphometric parameters with degeneration and tear of the discoid lateral meniscus: a cross-sectional quantitative MRI study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of a practical morphometric MRI ratio (a/b ratio) for identifying discoid lateral meniscus (DLM). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective diagnostic accuracy study included 212 adults (mean age 44.8 ± 9.7 years; 56.1% female) who underwent 1.5-T knee MRI between 2020 and 2022. The DLM group (n = 106) was defined according to established MRI criteria, with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls without discoid morphology. The index test was the a/b ratio, defined as the shortest lateral meniscal body width (a) divided by its medial offset from the lateral tibial spine (b). Additional evaluated morphometric parameters were tibial eminence width, tibial spine heights, and angles. The reference standard was consensus MRI diagnosis by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using ROC analysis, and measurement reproducibility was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
resultsThe a/b ratio was significantly higher in DLM than in controls (3.80 ± 5.4 vs. 0.47 ± 0.16; p < 0.001). A cut-off ≥ 0.764 yielded excellent diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.996, 95% CI 0.991-1.000), with 100% sensitivity and 96.2% specificity. Complete DLM demonstrated markedly higher ratios than incomplete types (12.2 ± 7.4 vs. 1.9 ± 1.8; p < 0.001; AUC 0.990, 95% CI 0.972-1.000). Inter- and intra-observer agreement for the ratio was excellent (ICC 0.935 and 0.972, respectively). Tibial eminence width and lateral tibial spine angle were also greater in DLM (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe a/b ratio is a practical and reproducible MRI-based metric with excellent diagnostic accuracy for DLM. Incorporation into routine MRI interpretation may enhance diagnostic confidence and aid preoperative planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41384962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.