Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384936›Full record

ArticleViolence against women2025

Embedding Technological Tools Into Screening for Family Violence in Antenatal Care: Views of Australian Midwives.

Minerva Kyei-Nimakoh, Caroline Bert, Kelsey Hegarty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Violence against women, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minerva Kyei-NimakohFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6225-5725
Caroline BertFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kelsey HegartyFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7532-5147

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and adverse health consequences of family violence among pregnant women highlight a need to develop effective screening tools in antenatal care. We explored how antenatal care midwives at a tertiary maternity hospital in Melbourne perceive the use of technological screening tools for family violence. Seven face-to-face and 10 telephone interviews were conducted. Data analysis was conducted using thematic analysis. Five themes were identified: clinician readiness for family violence screening; challenges of existing screening protocol; enhancing processes with technology; fostering disclosure and help-seeking; and coupling technology with face-to-face discussion. Overall, midwives were receptive to computerized family violence screening modalities.

Indexed as

antenatal carefamily violencemidwivesscreeningtechnological tools

Identifiers

PMID41384936
PMCPMC13672946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.