ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Arrhythmia Management in Complex Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrioventricular block is a common complication in L-looped single ventricles, and it may be exacerbated by palliative surgical procedures. CASE SUMMARY: We describe the case of a 43-year-old woman with history of double inlet left ventricle after classic Fontan procedure with subsequent Fontan revision, atrial flutter, and complete heart block managed with an epicardial pacemaker with progressive ventricular lead dysfunction. The patient was managed with leadless pacemaker implantation and atrial flutter ablation. DISCUSSION: Epicardial pacing is the preferred modality for patients with single-ventricle physiology and atrioventricular block. However, epicardial leads have high rates of lead failure often requiring multiple lead revisions by means of thoracotomies, which carry significant morbidity. Epicardial lead revision is not always successful in patients with multiple surgeries owing to adhesions, thus alternative pacing methods are required. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: This case illustrates a true heart team approach in the use of leadless pacemaker and atrial flutter ablation in a patient with a complex single-functioning ventricle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.