ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
A Signature of Typical MRI Features and Time-Intensity Curve Achieves Accurate Diagnosis of Distensible Orbital Venous Malformation.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can accurately differentiate between distensible orbital venous malformations (OVMs) and nondistensible OVMs. Methods: Fifty-one patients with nondistensible OVMs and 65 patients with distensible OVMs who underwent conventional MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI examinations were evaluated. The time-intensity curve (TIC) and apparent diffusion coefficient were calculated. Statistical analysis, including univariate and multivariate analysis, was performed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to assess the diagnostic ability of single and combined metrics. Results: In conventional MRI, nondistensible OVMs were more likely to present an enlarged orbital cavity (P = 0.032), a cystic component (P = 0.023), and a fluid-fluid level (P = 0.019), whereas distensible OVMs tended to exhibit a peak-like leading edge (P < 0.001). In DCE MRI, nondistensible OVM was more likely to present with a persistent TIC pattern and regional enhancement pattern, while distensible OVM was more likely to show a plateau TIC pattern (P < 0.001) and had a parallel proportion with regional and global enhancement patterns (P = 0.002). The combination of multiparametric MRI features, including an enlarged orbital cavity, a peak-like leading edge, and the type of TIC curve, demonstrated a high diagnostic efficiency (area under the curve = 0.869) in distinguishing between the two groups. Notably, the peak-like leading edge revealed a diagnostic specificity as high as 0.902. Conclusions: A combination of conventional MRI, DCE MRI, and DWI MRI yields high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating distensible OVMs from nondistensible OVMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.