Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384794›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

A Signature of Typical MRI Features and Time-Intensity Curve Achieves Accurate Diagnosis of Distensible Orbital Venous Malformation.

Yongyun Li, Yan Tang, Yidian Fu, Junqi Cui, Xin Song, Yefei Wang, Renbing Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yongyun LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan TangDepartment of Radiology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yidian FuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junqi CuiDepartment of Pathology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xin SongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yefei WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Renbing JiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can accurately differentiate between distensible orbital venous malformations (OVMs) and nondistensible OVMs. Methods: Fifty-one patients with nondistensible OVMs and 65 patients with distensible OVMs who underwent conventional MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI examinations were evaluated. The time-intensity curve (TIC) and apparent diffusion coefficient were calculated. Statistical analysis, including univariate and multivariate analysis, was performed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to assess the diagnostic ability of single and combined metrics. Results: In conventional MRI, nondistensible OVMs were more likely to present an enlarged orbital cavity (P = 0.032), a cystic component (P = 0.023), and a fluid-fluid level (P = 0.019), whereas distensible OVMs tended to exhibit a peak-like leading edge (P < 0.001). In DCE MRI, nondistensible OVM was more likely to present with a persistent TIC pattern and regional enhancement pattern, while distensible OVM was more likely to show a plateau TIC pattern (P < 0.001) and had a parallel proportion with regional and global enhancement patterns (P = 0.002). The combination of multiparametric MRI features, including an enlarged orbital cavity, a peak-like leading edge, and the type of TIC curve, demonstrated a high diagnostic efficiency (area under the curve = 0.869) in distinguishing between the two groups. Notably, the peak-like leading edge revealed a diagnostic specificity as high as 0.902. Conclusions: A combination of conventional MRI, DCE MRI, and DWI MRI yields high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating distensible OVMs from nondistensible OVMs.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingOrbitVascular MalformationsVeinsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID41384794
PMCPMC12707329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.