Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384700›Full record

ReviewHistopathology2026

Molecular pathology of testicular germ cell tumours: an update for practicing pathologists.

Alexander Fichtner, Stefanie Zschäbitz, Daniel Nettersheim, Felix Bremmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander FichtnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3942-2289
Stefanie ZschäbitzDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Centre for Tumour Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel NettersheimDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Laboratory, Translational UroOncology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4483-845X
Felix BremmerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0367-6527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testicular tumours are a diverse group of tumours, but most cases fall into the category of testicular germ cell tumours (TGCT). TGCTs are classified as either derived from a germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) or unrelated to GCNIS. Based on the development, molecular alterations and onset of development, TGCTs can further be divided into three groups. Type I TGCTs include prepubertal-type teratoma and yolk-sac tumour. Type II TGCTs are the only GCNIS-related tumours in this classification and include seminomas, embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, yolk-sac tumour and teratoma of postpubertal type. Type III TGCTs only include spermatocytic tumours. While genetic alterations are helpful in the diagnostic routine, they have not yet been useful in determining treatment options, as targetable alterations are very rare. Type I TGCTs most commonly exhibit chromosomal aberrations and rarely display alterations related to the Wnt signalling pathway. A common molecular alteration in type II TGCTs is the presence of an isochromosome 12p or gain of 12p material. It is thought that the isochromosome 12p develops during the progression of a GCNIS to an invasive TGCT. Seminomas can also exhibit c-Kit mutations or KRAS mutations. Alterations associated with the formation of a somatic-type malignancy and/or the development of cisplatin resistance include TP53 mutations or MDM2 gene amplifications as well as epigenetic alterations. In advanced cases, some of these genes might be useful as targeted therapies (e.g. KRAS G12C or BRAF V600E), but as these mutations are rare, studies on larger groups of patients are not possible. Amplification of chromosome 9 including the DMRT1 gene, or Ras mutations is common in spermatocytic tumours. Overlapping molecular alterations, including those on chromosome 12, have recently been discovered in some type III TGCT. Tumour serum markers (e.g. alpha-fetoprotein, beta-subunit of human gonadotropin and microRNAs) are helpful in the diagnosis and for follow-up analysis to detect recurrent disease or disease progression. This review article provides an overview of the current classification of testicular tumours and their molecular classification. Furthermore, it provides information on biomarkers that are helpful in the diagnostic setting. Additionally, we will provide guidance on how to examine a testicular tumour specimen histopathologically to reach an accurate diagnosis. Finally, we will outline the importance of the content of a histopathological report for the urologists and oncologists.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMalePathology, MolecularBiomarkers, TumorDMRT1germ cell neoplasia in situgerm cell tumourisochromosome 12ptestis

Identifiers

PMID41384700
PMCPMC12700052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.