ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2025
Performance of the Self-Controlled Case Series With Active Comparators for Drug Safety Signal Detection Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is little evidence about signal detection using UK primary care electronic health records (EHRs). The self controlled case series (SCCS) is one of the most promising methods for drug safety signal detection using real world data, and incorporating active comparators could potentially improve its performance by addressing confounding by indication.
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the performance of the SCCS with and without active comparators for signal detection using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.
methodsWe applied the SCCS to macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibiotics, using amoxicillin and cefalexin as active comparators. In total seven drugs, and 30 outcomes from all organ classes were selected. We developed a reference set of 104 positive controls and 58 negative controls, using a taxonomy framework to ensure the selected drug outcome pairs are theoretically well suited to the SCCS design. Two-year observation periods with a 30-day risk window after each dispensing were used. Diagnostic performance was measured using sensitivity and specificity with respect to the product labels.
resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of the SCCS without active comparator in the 2017/2018 observation period were 0.57 and 0.77 when limited to pairs with satisfactory power. Specificity increased up to 0.89 with active comparators, however sensitivity decreased to 0.18. Five drug-outcome pairs were signals of disproportionality before they were present on labels.
conclusionsUsing a carefully designed reference set of drug-outcome pairs well suited to the study design, the SCCS performed moderately well for signal detection in CPRD. Whilst active comparators effectively reduced confounding by indication, they also reduced the number of correctly identified positive controls, due to a reduction in power. We showed some evidence that SCCS is able to highlight SDRs before they were present on labels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.