Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384500›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Virtual Brain Inference (VBI), a flexible and integrative toolkit for efficient probabilistic inference on whole-brain models.

Abolfazl Ziaeemehr, Marmaduke Woodman, Lia Domide, Spase Petkoski, Viktor Jirsa, Meysam Hashemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. cuBNM: GPU-Accelerated Brain Network Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynamic causal modelling in probabilistic programming languages.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  11. A Python toolbox for neural circuit parameter inference.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Mapping global brain reconfigurations following local targeted manipulations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abolfazl ZiaeemehrAix Marseille University, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci System, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4696-9947
Marmaduke WoodmanAix Marseille University, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci System, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8410-4581
Lia DomideCodemart, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-2046
Spase PetkoskiAix Marseille University, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci System, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4540-6293
Viktor Jirsa *Aix Marseille University, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci System, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8251-8860
Meysam Hashemi *Aix Marseille University, INSERM, INS, Inst Neurosci System, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5289-9837

Funding

European Commission (EBRAINS 2.0 Project) 10.3030/101147319European Commission (EnvironMENTAL) 10.3030/101057429European Commission (Virtual Brain Twin Project) 10.3030/101137289France 2030 program ANR-22-PESN-0012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network neuroscience has proven essential for understanding the principles and mechanisms underlying complex brain (dys)function and cognition. In this context, whole-brain network modeling-also known as virtual brain modeling-combines computational models of brain dynamics (placed at each network node) with individual brain imaging data (to coordinate and connect the nodes), advancing our understanding of the complex dynamics of the brain and its neurobiological underpinnings. However, there remains a critical need for automated model inversion tools to estimate control (bifurcation) parameters at large scales associated with neuroimaging modalities, given their varying spatio-temporal resolutions. This study aims to address this gap by introducing a flexible and integrative toolkit for efficient Bayesian inference on virtual brain models, called Virtual Brain Inference (VBI). This open-source toolkit provides fast simulations, taxonomy of feature extraction, efficient data storage and loading, and probabilistic machine learning algorithms, enabling biophysically interpretable inference from non-invasive and invasive recordings. Through in-silico testing, we demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of inference for commonly used whole-brain network models and their associated neuroimaging data. VBI shows potential to improve hypothesis evaluation in network neuroscience through uncertainty quantification and contribute to advances in precision medicine by enhancing the predictive power of virtual brain models.

Indexed as

BrainModels, NeurologicalNerve NetAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansNeuroimagingbayesian inferencebrain dynamicscontrol parameterhumanneuroimagingneuroscienceprobabilistic machine learningvirtual brain modeling

Identifiers

PMID41384500
PMCPMC12700528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.