Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384445›Full record

ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2025

Effect of Ormocer-Based Adhesive and Flowable Composites on Dentine Bond Strength with Snow-Plow Technique.

Cansu Yikici Çöl, Sema Yazici Akbiyik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cansu Yikici Çöl
Sema Yazici Akbiyik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated the effects of an ormocer-based adhesive and an ormocer-based flowable resin composite on dentine bond strength and failure modes using the snow-plow technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-six samples were divided into six subgroups: universal adhesive, ormocer-based adhesive, and their combinations with or without the snow-plow technique (using either nanohybrid or ormocer-based flowable composite). All groups were etched, an adhesive agent was applied, and composite materials were placed. Samp-les were stored at 37°C in distilled water.

resultsNo statistically significant differences in bond strength were found among the groups. There was no difference between the universal adhesive and ormocer-based adhe-sive, or between the nanohybrid and ormocer-based flowable composites. The snow-plow technique also did not significantly affect bond strength (p > 0.05).

conclusionThe use of an ormocer-based flowable composite, an ormocer-based adhesive, or the snow-plow technique did not significantly influence short-term dentine bond strength.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental BondingDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsDental Stress AnalysisHumansMaterials TestingComposite ResinsDentin-Bonding Agentsflowable hybrid compositedental adhesiveormocerresin compositesshear bond strengthsnow-plow

Identifiers

PMID41384445
PMCPMC12704171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.