Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384256›Full record

ReviewNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2023

Monocytes in neonatal stroke and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: Pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic possibilities.

Pedro M Pimentel-Coelho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pedro M Pimentel-CoelhoCarlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2414-3386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS) and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) are common causes of neurological impairments in infants, for which treatment options are very limited. NAIS and HIE induce an innate immune response that involves the recruitment of peripheral immune cells, including monocytes, into the brain. Monocytes and monocyte-derived cells have the potential to contribute to both harmful and beneficial pathophysiological processes, such as neuroinflammation and brain repair, but their roles in NAIS and HIE remain poorly understood. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that monocyte-derived macrophages can persist in the brain for several months following NAIS and HIE in mice, with possible long-lasting consequences that are still unknown. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of monocyte infiltration and their potential functions in the ischemic brain, focusing on HIE and NAIS. Therapeutic strategies targeting monocytes and the possibility of using monocytes for cell-based therapies are also discussed.

Indexed as

bone marrowcerebral ischemiamicrogliamonocyte‐derived macrophagesmonocytesneonatal brain injuryneonatal hypoxia‐ischemiaperinatal stroke

Identifiers

PMID41384256
PMCPMC12486951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.