ArticleEJHaem2025
Efficacy and Safety of Pegfilgrastim in Patients With Severe Congenital Neutropenia.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) is commonly treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to reduce neutropenia and the associated risk of infections. Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting form of G-CSF, provides the benefit of less frequent dosing; however, its application in SCN has not been extensively studied. This study aims to assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of transitioning SCN patients from standard G-CSF therapy to pegfilgrastim. Methods: We followed eight patients with severe congenital neutropenia (five males, average age 17.8 years) who had been on G-CSF treatment for at least five years. They were switched to pegfilgrastim injections (3-6 mg every 7-14 days). Dosing was individualized to obtain an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) above 1000/µL in all patients. Over a five-year follow-up under treatment with pegfilgrastim, patients were evaluated for ANC levels, infection frequency, adverse effects, and quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Neutropenia (FACT-N) questionnaire. In addition, yearly abdominal ultrasounds, bone density every two years, and genetic screening for RUNX1 and the G-CSF receptor mutations were performed. Results: Pegfilgrastim significantly improved ANC levels compared to prior G-CSF treatment ( Conclusion: Pegfilgrastim can be used as an alternative to daily G-CSF in SCN, providing stable ANC and QoL improvements with individualized dosing. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy. Clinical trial registration: This trial is registered at https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/ in Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) # IRCT20150125020786N3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.