ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of a High-Precision Immunoassay for the Creatine Kinase-MB Isoenzyme.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) is an important biomarker for diagnosing myocardial injury. Although cardiac troponin is widely used as the primary biomarker for myocardial infarction, CK-MB measurement remains clinically relevant due to its shorter half-life and utility in detecting reinfarction and estimating infarct size. Here, we established and evaluated a fully automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA; Lumipulse Presto CK-MB) for the LUMIPULSE L2400 analyzer. The primary objective was to assess its analytical performance, and the secondary objective was to explore its potential clinical utility as a cardiac biomarker in patients with diabetes. Methods Analytical performance was assessed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines, including evaluations of sensitivity, linearity, dilution recovery, precision (repeatability, between-run, between-day, and total), and interference/cross-reactivity. Method comparisons were conducted using a panel of 95 CK-MB-positive serum samples against existing CLEIAs, chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA), immunoturbidimetry assays, and a CK-MB activity assay. Pearson correlation and Passing-Bablok regression were used to assess agreement. Discrepant samples were subjected to isoenzyme analysis. An exploratory clinical study measured CK-MB concentrations, as well as multiple other cardiac biomarkers, using banked serum samples from 120 diabetic patients grouped according to cardiovascular disease history and 92 diabetic patients grouped according to hypoglycemic treatment risk. Results The assay demonstrated high analytical sensitivity (limit of detection: 0.039 ng/mL; limit of quantification: 0.047 ng/mL), excellent linearity over a range of 0.1-349.0 ng/mL, and robust precision (coefficient of variations (CVs) < 3.5%). Strong correlations were observed with existing CLEIA (r = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.995-0.999), CLIA (r = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.988-0.994), and immunoturbidimetry (r = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.992-0.997) assays for CK-MB quantification. All discordant results were resolved by isoenzyme analysis. CK-MB levels were significantly higher in diabetic patients with a history of myocardial infarction compared with those without cardiovascular disease (p < 0.001). Conclusions The CK-MB assay demonstrated excellent sensitivity, precision, and strong correlation with conventional procedures. Isoenzyme analysis provided insights into discrepancies observed with activity-based measurements. Exploratory analysis of diabetic patient samples revealed trends related to cardiovascular history. These findings support the potential utility of this assay in both clinical diagnostics and research settings and encourage further multicentric studies to confirm its clinical usefulness, including exploratory observations suggesting broader applicability in populations at elevated risk for cardiac disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.