ReviewLe infezioni in medicina2025
The Role of Big Data in Developing Innovative Predictive Learning Models for Neglected Tropical Diseases within the New Generation of the Evidence-Based Medicine Pyramid.
Review in Le infezioni in medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review of AI innovations for tackling antimicrobial resistance.Le infezioni in medicina · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) have been identified as a major global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, yet limited scientific attention has been given to them. Simultaneously, the emergence of Big Data and artificial intelligence has been transforming the way medical evidence is produced. Despite this, minimal integration between Big Data approaches and NTDs research has been observed. To explore this gap, a narrative review with a brief scientometrics analysis was conducted alongside a critical review of 13 original studies and systematic reviews that applied Big Data to NTDs. Studies were assessed according to design, objectives, disease focus, and geographic scope. Findings revealed a significant disparity: although extensive literature exists on Big Data and on NTDs separately, only a small number of studies combine both. Most of these were focused on dengue, with limited geographic representation and methodological consistency. These results suggest that the field remains underdeveloped and fragmented. Opportunities for interdisciplinary and data-intensive approaches have not been fully utilized. It is proposed that, by aligning Big Data applications with the new generation of the evidence-based medicine pyramid, more inclusive, predictive, and context-sensitive research on NTDs could be enabled, supporting equitable health decision-making in historically neglected populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.