SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Transplant Bendamustine as a Platform for Immune Modulation After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- The real-world safety of ruxolitinib in graft-versus-host disease treatment: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Sequential Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome and TA-TMA After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Immediate versus delayed short-course ruxolitinib for acute GVHD prophylaxis after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Despite standard prophylaxis, acute and chronic GVHD incidence remains high. Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAK1/2), shows promise in treating steroid-refractory GVHD. However, its efficacy and safety as an adjunct to standard prophylactic regimens remain subjects of debate. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib when used as an adjunct to GVHD prophylaxis following allo-HSCT. Methods: Comprehensive studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Outcomes measures included the incidence rates of acute/chronic GVHD, overall survival (OS), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation events. Pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random/fixed-effects models. Results: A total of 12 studies, including 406 patients, were analyzed. Most of these studies were non-randomized. The pooled incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD was 10.4% (95% CI: 7.3-13.5%) and 2.9% (0.6-5.2%), respectively, with no heterogeneity ( Discussion: Ruxolitinib as GVHD prophylaxis significantly reduces acute GVHD severity and maintains favorable survival outcomes, likely due to Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator (JAK-STAT) pathway inhibition. However, elevated CMV/EBV reactivation rates the need for vigilant monitoring. These findings support ruxolitinib's role as a promising adjunct in GVHD prevention, warranting further randomized trials to confirm long-term safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.