SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
AI literacy and competency in nursing education: preparing students and faculty members for an AI-enabled future-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Use of artificial intelligence in education and training of radiology.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Pooled it
- The Associations of AI Literacy, AI Self-Efficacy and AI Attitudes Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Path Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards artificial intelligence among nursing students: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Exploring factors associated with nursing students' artificial intelligence literacy: insights from a national mixed methods study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- How to Teach Generative Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Medical Education.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- Conceptualization, Contexts, and Measurement of Nursing Theoretical Literacy: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Community Health Nursing Education and Practice: Opportunities, Ethical Challenges, and Future Directions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Core competencies of clinical nursing educators in the AI era: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Educating and learning in the Artificial Intelligence era: formative challenges and new roles for the educator.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- The association between AI dependence, AI literacy, and critical thinking ability among nursing interns: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT literacy among surgical healthcare professionals: knowledge, attitudes, and perceived clinical utility.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Reframing workplace safety, wellbeing, and performance among operating room nurses in contemporary healthcare systems.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- The Mediation Effect of Nurses' Artificial Intelligence Literacy Between Professional Self-Concept and Evidence-Based Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Inclusive Leadership, Psychological Safety, AI Readiness, and Nurses' AI Literacy: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- AI literacy as a potential mediator between attitude and self-efficacy among PICU nurses: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy among nursing students and its association with learning engagement.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Current Landscape of Curriculum Development and Implementation in Medical Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Clinical nurses as digital guardians: unlocking the key determinants of digital resilience in the AI era.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Innovation Climate in the Relationship Between Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence, Creative Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Competence.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made its way into every dimension of human life, and its impact is significant and multifaceted. Specifically, the effect of AI in nursing education has reshaped the healthcare system. However, this technological shift in nursing and the healthcare system still needs to be evaluated in multiple aspects to ensure the effective use of AI and to prepare future professionals. Methods: This PROSPERO-registered systematic literature review and meta-analysis explored the integration of AI literacy and competency within nursing curricula and the profession globally from January 2020 to June 2025. The study specifically aimed to: (1) examine the extent of AI integration within nursing curricula; (2) assess the awareness, attitudes, and readiness of nursing students, faculty, and practitioners toward AI; (3) evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions designed to enhance AI literacy and competency; (4) identify ethical, institutional, and pedagogical challenges associated with AI adoption in nursing education; and (5) provide evidence-based recommendations for standardized and equitable AI education frameworks in nursing. Results: The review synthesizes evidence from 111 peer-reviewed articles, including 18 distinct quantitative studies, which have been further analyzed through meta-analytic techniques. PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for relevant articles and extract the required information. Meta-analysis reveals high levels of AI-related awareness (pooled estimate = 73%, 95% CI: 64-80%) and positive attitudes (71%, 95% CI: 63-78%) among various nursing groups. The implementation of AI-related skills remains highly variable (67%, 95% CI: 55-78%), especially in low-resource settings, which needs careful interpretation. Overall, meta-analysis findings highlight significant variations and reflect non-uniformity and disparities across regions, institutions, and nursing groups (students, staff, faculty). Conclusion: Thematic synthesis underscores the need for standardized AI education, tailored faculty development, and equitable access to digital tools. Although individual-level awareness and attitudes toward AI are promising, this review reveals a lack of institutional readiness, with many nursing programs lacking standardized curricula, faculty training, and infrastructural support. Moreover, findings emphasize the critical need for broader institutional and policy efforts to match individual enthusiasm with institutional capacity in preparing nurses for an AI-enabled healthcare landscape. Further, this review offers evidence-based recommendations for various stakeholders to ensure inclusive and future-ready nursing education. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251090108.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.