Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41384110›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

AI literacy and competency in nursing education: preparing students and faculty members for an AI-enabled future-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Majeda M El-Banna, Mirza Rizwan Sajid, Moattar Raza Rizvi, Waqas Sami, Angela M McNelis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Majeda M El-BannaCollege of Nursing, QU-Health Sector, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Mirza Rizwan SajidDepartment of Statistics, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Moattar Raza RizviFaculty of Allied Health Science, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, India.
Waqas SamiDepartment of Pre-Clinical Affairs, College of Nursing, Health Sector, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Angela M McNelisSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made its way into every dimension of human life, and its impact is significant and multifaceted. Specifically, the effect of AI in nursing education has reshaped the healthcare system. However, this technological shift in nursing and the healthcare system still needs to be evaluated in multiple aspects to ensure the effective use of AI and to prepare future professionals. Methods: This PROSPERO-registered systematic literature review and meta-analysis explored the integration of AI literacy and competency within nursing curricula and the profession globally from January 2020 to June 2025. The study specifically aimed to: (1) examine the extent of AI integration within nursing curricula; (2) assess the awareness, attitudes, and readiness of nursing students, faculty, and practitioners toward AI; (3) evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions designed to enhance AI literacy and competency; (4) identify ethical, institutional, and pedagogical challenges associated with AI adoption in nursing education; and (5) provide evidence-based recommendations for standardized and equitable AI education frameworks in nursing. Results: The review synthesizes evidence from 111 peer-reviewed articles, including 18 distinct quantitative studies, which have been further analyzed through meta-analytic techniques. PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for relevant articles and extract the required information. Meta-analysis reveals high levels of AI-related awareness (pooled estimate = 73%, 95% CI: 64-80%) and positive attitudes (71%, 95% CI: 63-78%) among various nursing groups. The implementation of AI-related skills remains highly variable (67%, 95% CI: 55-78%), especially in low-resource settings, which needs careful interpretation. Overall, meta-analysis findings highlight significant variations and reflect non-uniformity and disparities across regions, institutions, and nursing groups (students, staff, faculty). Conclusion: Thematic synthesis underscores the need for standardized AI education, tailored faculty development, and equitable access to digital tools. Although individual-level awareness and attitudes toward AI are promising, this review reveals a lack of institutional readiness, with many nursing programs lacking standardized curricula, faculty training, and infrastructural support. Moreover, findings emphasize the critical need for broader institutional and policy efforts to match individual enthusiasm with institutional capacity in preparing nurses for an AI-enabled healthcare landscape. Further, this review offers evidence-based recommendations for various stakeholders to ensure inclusive and future-ready nursing education. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251090108.

Indexed as

AI competence in healthcareAI literacy and competencyethical and institutional challengesfaculty readinessmeta-analysisnursing curriculum integrationsystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID41384110
PMCPMC12689331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.