ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
PBL-based online-offline hybrid teaching in nursing education: enhancing self-regulated learning and teaching effectiveness in China.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A quasi-experimental comparison of outcome-based hybrid learning and traditional instruction in environmental health education for preventive medicine undergraduates from Guilin Medical University.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Application of mind mapping combined with case-based learning model using simulated clinical cases in nursing education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate students' satisfaction and learning outcomes associated with a blended online and offline teaching method based on problem-based learning (PBL). Design: A total of 238 third-year undergraduate nursing students from two classes participated. Each class was divided into eight groups, with 14 to 15 students per group. Eight teachers were involved. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among students after class. Methods: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were chosen as the teaching cases. Teachers uploaded teaching resources to Superstar Learning App for 1 week of online self-regulated learning (SRL). During the offline class, each group addressed two clinical questions through presentations, simulated scenarios and role-playing exercises. After course, students were invited to complete an anonymous satisfaction questionnaire. A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed, a descriptive analysis of participants was conducted, and factors influencing teaching effectiveness were analyzed. Results: Overall, 79.82% of students expressed greater satisfaction with this blended method compared to traditional teaching approaches, 95.07% of students gave positive feedback on the course, and 92.82% reported that their learning outcomes either met or exceeded expectations. Students who engaged intensively in collecting, analyzing, and organizing information during the online phase, or who devoted ≥5 h to online learning, were significantly more likely to achieve or surpass their learning expectations ( Conclusion: The blended PBL approach was associated with higher student satisfaction in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing course. Class participation correlated positively with evaluations and outcomes. While active participants achieved expected results, less participative students also attained comparable outcomes through alternative methods. Although pre-class preparation time predicted learning effectiveness, efficiency was equally significant. Adopting a student-centered, PBL-oriented approach with diversified resources is recommended to address individual needs, enhance satisfaction, and develop SRL skills. This model promotes SRL by encouraging students to assess and adjust their learning strategies, thereby meeting diverse needs and supporting personalized development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.