ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Awareness and practices of community pharmacists toward dextromethorphan misuse in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: implications for regulation and public health.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dextromethorphan (DXM) is an over-the-counter cough suppressant with recognized potential for misuse and abuse when taken at supratherapeutic doses. Community pharmacists are well positioned to identify and prevent such misuse, yet limited data exist from Saudi Arabia regarding their awareness, dispensing practices, and views on regulation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among community pharmacists in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, using a self-administered questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses, and logistic regression was applied to identify factors associated with perceived increases in DXM sales and the adoption of restriction strategies. Results: A total of 252 pharmacists participated. Most respondents recognized DXM misuse as a local problem (206; 81.8%) and believed sales had increased over the preceding 2 years (131; 52.0%). Peer influence and social media promotion were identified as common drivers of misuse (206; 81.8%). The majority reported adopting restrictive dispensing practices, including refusal to sell to suspected abusers (178; 70.6%), and expressed strong support for tighter legal controls (230; 91.3%) and public awareness campaigns (198; 78.6%). Logistic regression showed that requests for non-OTC DXM products were associated with perceived increases in sales (OR = 2.13; 95% CI = 1.18-3.85; Conclusion: Community pharmacists in Jeddah demonstrated awareness of DXM misuse and recognized the role of social and digital influences in promoting it. Their broad support for regulatory restrictions and preventive campaigns indicates readiness to contribute to public health strategies. Nonetheless, limited confidence in managing suspected cases highlights the need for targeted training and continued research across multiple regions to inform effective regulatory and educational responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.