ArticleBio-protocol2025
Revisiting Primary Microglia Isolation Protocol: An Improved Method for Microglia Extraction.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CD22 regulates Aβ clearance in microglia through INPP5D signaling.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, play a crucial role in maintaining neural homeostasis and in regulating neurodevelopment, neuroinflammation, tissue repair, and neurotoxicity. They are also key contributors to the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative disorders, underscoring the need for in vitro models that accurately recapitulate disease-relevant conditions. Among the available isolation methods, the classical mixed glial culture shaking technique remains the most commonly employed, while alternatives such as magnetic bead separation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) offer higher purity but are often constrained by technical complexity and cost. In this study, we refined the traditional shaking method by supplementing specific cytokines during culture to enhance microglial viability and proliferation. Our optimized protocol produced primary microglia with higher purity, greater yield, and improved viability compared with the conventional approach, thereby increasing experimental efficiency while substantially reducing time, animal usage, and overall cost. Key features • The microglial cells obtained using this protocol achieve a purity of approximately 90%. • This protocol maximizes the viability of primary microglial cells. • The entire procedure requires a minimum of 9 days to complete. • Antibiotic or antifungal solutions are not used in this protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.