ReviewFrontiers in neuroergonomics2025
Let's put a person back into Cyber-Physical-Social research: Public Mental Models Framework.
Review in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current paper our focus is on linking Public Mental Models with behavior, Situation Awareness and stress management, with predicting and intervening in public behavior in critical situations. Understanding and influencing behavior within complex Cyber-Physical-Social Systems (CPSS) requires an explicit link between mental models, behavior, situation awareness, and stress management. This paper introduces the Public Mental Models Framework (PMMF) as a systematic approach for analyzing and predicting public behavior in critical situations, thereby improving adaptive decision-making and person-AI collaboration. The PMMF explains how internal and external indicators such as cognitive, social, cultural, political, economic, and technological, that shape perception and behavioral responses across multiple levels: individual, team, organizational, community, and societal. By identifying these triggers and markers, the framework supports why behaviors deviate or stabilize under stress, providing an analytical basis for targeted interventions and resilience-oriented design. In contrast to traditional Situation Awareness models that emphasize what is perceived and how it is processed, PMMF focuses on the interpretive mechanisms through which actors construct meaning and make decisions. Integrating PMMF with the Motivation-Opportunity-Ability (MOA) theory enables systematic assessment of behavioral potential and performance within CPSS. This integration strengthens the neuroergonomic foundation for evaluating human and AI entities and enhances the capacity to design interventions that foster informed, adaptive, and ethically aligned behavior in complex sociotechnical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.