ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Compared analysis of physiology and transcriptomics reveals superior cold tolerance in CV-1 compared to K326.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Low-temperature stress can cause damage to the growth and development of tobacco plants and the yield and quality of tobacco leaves. Methods: To elucidate the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying the differing responses of different tobacco varieties to low-temperature stress at 6 °C, transcriptomics analysis was employed to investigate the differences in physiological and gene regulatory networks between K326 and CV-1. Results: Morphological analysis revealed that CV-1 recovered more quickly to its pre-cold stress state than K326 during the later stages of low-temperature stress, demonstrating stronger cold tolerance. Physiological and biochemical analyses showed that compared to K326, CV-1 exhibited stronger antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase) and lower membrane lipid peroxidation damage, as indicated by the decreased malondialdehyde content. Differential gene expression analysis indicated that the enhanced cold tolerance of CV-1 may be attributed to stronger phenylalanine synthesis capacity, NADH synthesis, and antioxidant enzyme activities. Weighted co-expression network analysis revealed that the enhanced cold tolerance of CV-1 may be attributed to its unique SUMOylation and phosphorylation regulatory pathways of proteins such as Discussion: This study revealed differences in gene regulatory networks between K326 and CV-1 in response to low-temperature stress and identified candidate genes associated with low-temperature stress, which can be utilized for genetic improvement of tobacco plants to enhance their cold tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.