ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Evaporation and transpiration processes and changes in their proportional relationships in cotton fields under varying degrees of film biodegradation.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Biodegradable film (BE) is completely degraded during use, which effectively addresses the pollution caused by residual film in agricultural fields, serving as an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional polyethylene film (PE). However, BE surface degradation and rupture is a dynamic process, and the relationship between the coverage area and soil moisture and evapotranspiration partitioning changes has yet to be quantified. Methods: Therefore, a field experiment was conducted in 2021 and 2022, employing a film recognition method based on supervised classifiers to monitor the BE degradation area. Variations in evaporation and transpiration were determined in cotton fields under PE and BEs at different irrigation depths. Results: Under BE, for every 1% increase in film area damage compared to PE, the soil evaporation rate increased by 0.34 mm∺d Discussion: Increases in irrigation depth and canopy coverage in cotton fields had similar inhibitory effects on evaporation as film application, mitigating the gradual increase in soil evaporation caused by BE rupture. Therefore, we suggest that irrigation quotas be appropriately increased when using BEs in oasis cotton areas to achieve coverage effects comparable to PEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.