Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41383921›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Research on plant characteristics and application strategies for the planning and design of herbal gardens.

Xiaohua Lin, Zhaocheng Wu, Junmin Liu, Liwen Gao, Ruoting Zhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaohua LinSchool of Pharmaceutical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zhaocheng WuGuangdong Agribusiness Tropical Agriculture Institute Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Junmin LiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Liwen GaoSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ruoting ZhanHuman Resource Department, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbal gardens have a long history worldwide and serve important functions in education, science popularization, cultural dissemination, tourism, and convalescence. In recent years, growing interest in health, nature, and culture has led numerous institutions to establish herbal gardens of various scales. However, standardized research on the planning and design of herbal gardens is still lacking, especially regarding species selection, planting layout, and the exploration and functional utilization of medicinal plant properties. This study conducted a detailed analysis of over 1,000 medicinal plant species in the Herbal Garden of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, focusing on taxonomy, plant habit types, ecological habits, aromatic and ornamental characteristics, medicinal functions, edible properties, and cultural significance. Based on this analysis, the study proposed design principles rooted in ecological diversity, health and safety, and practical functionality, and proposed context-specific, characteristic-driven garden planning to maximize the educational, therapeutic, and public outreach potential of herbal gardens. The findings aim to provide theoretical and practical guidance for the planning and design of diverse types of herbal gardens.

Indexed as

application strategiesherbal gardenplanning and designplant characteristicsstatistics

Identifiers

PMID41383921
PMCPMC12689864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.