ArticleBJUI compass2025
MRI performance to identify clinically significant prostate cancer following focal cryo-ablation.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PHI for adverse pathology and PHI density for upgrading: two complementary predictors in localized prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- MRI performance to identify clinically significant prostate cancer following focal cryo-ablation.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the performance of MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) recurrence following focal cryo-ablation over five years of oncological surveillance. Subjects and Methods: A total of 305 men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing focal cryo-ablation (FCA) at our referral centre between 03/2017 and 03/2024 were prospectively enrolled in an outcomes registry. Selection criteria, treatment planning and oncological surveillance were standardized. The initial surveillance protocol included MRI at six months, two, 3.5, five years, and surveillance prostate biopsy at six months, two and five years. The surveillance protocol biopsy at six months and two years was abandoned for a negative MRI in May 2019 and November 2020. Performance statistics of MRI for detecting csPCa recurrence were assessed among mandatory MRI and biopsy dyads at six months and two years. Clinically significant prostate cancer detection rates for suspicious (positive) and negative MRI included all subjects. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MRI to predict csPCa is 25%, 93%, 29% and 91%. The csPCa detection rate for positive and negative MRI was 40% and 7.0%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for MRI as a predictor of csPCa was 0.60, suggesting limitations of MRI for predicting csPCa. A limitation is that a validated instrument for positive MRI was not available during the study. Conclusions: Six-month MRI is not recommended owing to its very low csPCa detection rate. The increasing csPCa detection rates at two and five years suggest these are reasonable time points to perform MRI. Prostate biopsy should be performed on all cases with positive MRI, and can safely be deferred in most cases with negative MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.